Current trends and outcomes for unilateral groin hernia repairs in the United States using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database: A multicenter propensity score matching analysis of 30-day and 1-year outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Different unilateral groin hernia repair approaches have been developed in the last 2 decades. The most commonly done approaches are open inguinal hernia repair by the Lichenstein technique, laparoscopic approach by either total extraperitoneal or transabdominal preperitoneal, and robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach. Hence, this study aimed to compare early and late postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent unilateral robotic transabdominal preperitoneal, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, and laparoscopic total extraperitoneal, and open groin hernia repair using a United States national hernia database, the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative Database. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database was retrospectively reviewed, including all adult patients who underwent elective unilateral groin hernia repair from 2015 to 2022, with a 1:1 propensity score match analysis conducted for balanced groups. The univariate analysis compared the groups across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative timeframes. RESULTS: The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database identified 14,320 patients who underwent elective unilateral groin hernia repair and had documented 30 days of follow-up. Propensity score matching stratified 1,598 patients to each group (total of 6,392). The median age was 64 years (interquartile range 53-74) for open groin hernia repair, whereas 60 (interquartile range 47-69) for laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, 62 (interquartile range 48-70) for laparoscopic total extraperitoneal, and 60 (interquartile range 47-70) for robotic transabdominal preperitoneal were noted. Open groin hernia repair had more American Society of Anesthesiologists score 4 (52, 3%) patients (P < .001). A painful bulge was the most common indication (>85%). Operating room time >2 hours was more significant in the robotic transabdominal preperitoneal group (123, 8%; P < .001). Seroma rate was higher in the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (134, 8%; P < .001). A 1-year analysis had 1,103 patients. Hematoma, surgical site infection, readmission, reoperation, and hernia recurrence at 30 days or 1 year did not differ, with an overall recurrence rate of 6% (n = 67) at 1 year (P = .33). In patients with body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, the robotic approach had lower rates of surgical site occurrence (n = 12, 4%; P = .002) and seroma (n = 5, 2%; P < .001) compared with the other groups. When evaluating recurrence 1 year after surgery, the robotic transabdominal preperitoneal group had 10% versus 18% open groin hernia repair, 11% laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, and 18% laparoscopic total extraperitoneal, but it was not statistically significant (P = .53). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in readmission, reoperation, and surgical site infection among the surgical techniques at 30 days. However, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal was associated with more seromas. Hernia recurrence at 1 year was similar across groups; the robotic approach had the lowest recurrence rate among all 3 repairs but did not reach statistical significance. The robotic approach performed better in patients with a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 for surgical site occurrence and seroma than in other surgical techniques.

Mesh versus suture repair of incisional hernias 2 cm or less: Is mesh necessary? A propensity score-matched analysis of the abdominal core health quality collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Mesh has been the acceptable standard for incisional hernia repair regardless of hernia size. It is not clear whether there is a size of incisional hernias in whom repair would be best performed without mesh. This study aims to compare outcomes of mesh versus suture repairs for incisional hernias <2 cm in size. METHODS: Incisional hernia repairs from 2012 to 2021 for hernias ≤2 cm in width were queried from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative. Those with 1-year follow up were considered. Hernia recurrence was defined using composite hernia recurrence, which combines both clinical and patient reported outcomes. Propensity score matching was performed between mesh and non-mesh using body mass index, smoking, diabetes, and drains as covariates. RESULTS: A total of 352 patients met inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, there were 132 repairs with mesh and 71 without. There was no difference in recurrence rates at 1 year between mesh and non-mesh repairs (15% vs 24%, P = .12). Mesh was associated with a higher rate of 30-day postoperative complications (11% vs 1%, P = .017). There were no differences in 1-year quality of life scores. CONCLUSION: The repair of incisional hernias ≤2 cm without mesh results in similar recurrence rates, similar quality of life scores, and lower postoperative early complications compared with repairs with mesh. Our findings suggest that there may be select patients with small incisional hernias that could reasonably undergo incisional hernia repair without mesh. Longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm ideal candidates and durability of these repairs.

Abdominal Core Health: What Is It?

Abdominal core health encompasses the stability and function of the abdominal core and associated quality of life. Interventions to maintain core health include surgical and non-surgical therapies that integrate the functional relatedness of the abdominal core components.

S-144 lack of association between glycated hemoglobin and adverse outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing ventral hernia repair: an ACHQC study.

INTRODUCTION: Elevated preoperative glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is believed to predict complications in diabetic patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR). Our objective was to assess the association between HbA1c and outcomes of VHR in diabetic patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) database. We included adult diabetic patients who underwent elective VHR with an available HbA1c result. The patients were divided into two groups (HbA1c < 8% and HbA1c ≥ 8%). Patient demographics, comorbidities, hernia characteristics, operative details, and surgical outcomes were compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of complications was performed. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess probability of composite recurrence at different HbA1c levels. RESULTS: 2167 patients met the inclusion criteria (HbA1c < 8% = 1,776 and HbA1c ≥ 8% = 391). Median age was 61 years and median body mass index was 34 kg/m2. 75% had an American Society of Anesthesiology class of 3. The median HbA1c was 6.5% in the HbA1c < 8% group versus 8.7% in the HbA1c ≥ 8% group. 73% were incisional hernias, 34% were recurrent, and median hernia width was 6 cm. Open approach was used in 63% and myofascial release was performed in 46%. Median follow-up was 27 days. There were no clinically significant differences in the rates of overall 30-day complications, wound complications, reoperation, readmission, mortality, length of stay and quality of life and pain scores between the two groups. Regression analyses did not identify an association between HbA1c and the rates of complications, surgical site infection or composite recurrence across the spectrum of HbA1c values. CONCLUSION: Our study finds no evidence of an association between HbA1c and operative outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing elective VHR.

S041-Trends and short-term outcomes of three approaches to minimally invasive repair of small ventral hernias. An ACHQC analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Different approaches and mesh positions are used for minimally invasive ventral hernia repair (MIS-VHR). Our aim was to evaluate the trends and short-term outcomes of intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM), preperitoneal, and retromuscular repairs for small ventral hernias. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC). We included elective MIS-VHR in adults with hernia defect width < = 6 cm from 2012 to 2021. We compared patient/hernia characteristics, trends, and short-term outcomes between IPOM, preperitoneal, and retromuscular repairs. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 7261 patients were included (IPOM = 4484, preperitoneal = 1829, retromuscular = 948). Preperitoneal repair was associated with lower rates of incisional (preperitoneal = 37%, IPOM = 63%, retromuscular = 73%) and recurrent hernias (preperitoneal = 11%, IPOM = 21%, retromuscular = 22%) compared to IPOM and retromuscular. Median defect width was 3.0, 2.0, and 4.0 cm for IPOM, preperitoneal, and retromuscular, respectively. There has been a progressive increase in the proportion of preperitoneal and retromuscular repairs over time (10% in 2013-53% in 2021 of all MIS-VHR). Robotic approach was more frequently utilized in preperitoneal and retromuscular (both > 85%) compared to IPOM (47%). Transversus abdominis release was performed in 14% of retromuscular repairs. After IPTW, no clinically significant differences were noted in the short-term outcomes between IPOM versus preperitoneal. Retromuscular repairs were associated with higher risk of 30-day reoperation (OR = 3.54, 95%CI [1.67, 7.5] and OR = 5.29, 95%CI [1.23, 22.74]) compared to IPOM and preperitoneal repairs, respectively, and higher risk of 30-day readmission compared to preperitoneal repairs (OR = 2.6, 95%CI [2.6, 6.4]). CONCLUSION: Based on ACHQC data, preperitoneal and retromuscular approaches for MIS-VHR of small hernias have increased over time and are primarily performed robotically. Transversus abdominis release was performed in 14% of retromuscular repairs of these small hernias. Retromuscular repairs were associated with higher 30-day readmission and reoperation rates compared to the other approaches.

Permanent vs Absorbable Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair in Contaminated Fields: Multicenter Propensity-Matched Analysis of 1-Year Outcomes Using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative Database.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the use of absorbable mesh in contaminated fields aimed to reduce postoperative morbidity at the expense of increased hernia recurrence. This dogma has recently been challenged in randomized trials that demonstrate the advantages of permanent mesh in this setting. Although these studies are of high quality, their reproducibility across institutions is limited. We sought to compare the outcomes between permanent and absorbable mesh in a multicentric cohort from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent elective ventral hernia repair in class II and III surgeries from January 2013 to December 2021 were identified within the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative. Outcomes were compared among permanent (P), absorbable synthetic (AS), and biologic (B) mesh at 30 days and 1 year using a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2,484 patients were included: 73.4% P, 11.2% AS, and 15.4% B. Of these, 64% were clean-contaminated and 36% contaminated interventions. After propensity score-matched analysis, there was no significant difference between groups regarding surgical site occurrence (P 16%, AS 15%, B 21%, p = 0.13), surgical site infection (P 12%, AS 14%, B 12%, p = 0.64), and surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention at 30 days (P 12%, AS 15%, B 17%, p = 0.1). At 1 year, the recurrence rate was significantly lower among the permanent group (P 23%, AS 40%, B 32%, p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicentric cohort, permanent mesh has equivalent 30-day outcomes and lower rates of hernia recurrence at 1 year after hernia repair in contaminated fields.

Comparison of post-operative outcomes of large direct inguinal hernia repairs based on operative approach (open vs. laparoscopic vs. robotic) using the ACHQC (Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative) database.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes for open, laparoscopic, and robotic hernia repairs for direct, unilateral inguinal hernia repairs, with particular focus on 30-day morbidity surgical site infection (SSI); surgical site occurrence (SSO); SSI/SSO requiring procedural interventions (SSOPI), reoperation, and recurrence. METHODS: The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database was queried for patients undergoing elective, primary, > 3 cm medial, unilateral inguinal hernia repairs with an open (Lichtenstein), laparoscopic, or robotic operative approach. Preoperative demographics and patient characteristics, operative techniques, and outcomes were studied. A 1-to-1 propensity score matching algorithm was used for each operative approach pair to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: There were 848 operations included: 297 were open, 285 laparoscopic, and 266 robotic hernia repairs. There was no evidence of a difference in primary endpoints at 30 days including SSI, SSO, SSI/SSO requiring procedural interventions (SSOPI), reoperation, readmission, or recurrence for any of the operative approach pairs (open vs. robotic, open vs. laparoscopic, robotic vs. laparoscopic). For the open vs. laparoscopic groups, QoL score at 30 day was lower (better) for laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery (OR 0.53 [0.31, 0.92], p = 0.03), but this difference did not hold at the 1-year survey (OR 1.37 [0.48, 3.92], p = 0.55). Similarly, patients who underwent robotic repair were more likely to have a higher (worse) 30-day QoL score (OR 2.01 [1.18, 3.42], p = 0.01), but no evidence of a difference at 1 year (OR 0.83 [0.3, 2.26] p = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not reveal significant post-operative outcomes between open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for large medial inguinal hernias. Surgeons should continue to tailor operative approach based on patient needs and their own surgical expertise.

Ventral hernia repair: an increasing burden affecting abdominal core health.

PURPOSE: To estimate the annual volume and cost of ventral hernia repair (VHR) performed in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample (NASS) for 2016-2019. Patients over the age of 18 who underwent open (OVHR) or minimally invasive ventral hernia repair (MISVHR) were identified. NIS procedural costs were estimated using cost-to-charge ratios; NASS costs were estimated using the NIS cost-to-charge ratios stratified by payer status. Costs were adjusted for inflation to 2021 dollars using US Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index. RESULTS: On average 610,998 VHRs were performed per year. Most were outpatient (67.3% per year), and open (70.7%). MIS procedures increased from 25.8% to 32.8% of all VHRs. Inpatient OVHR had significantly higher associated cost than MISVHR [$35,511 (34,100-36,921) vs. $21,165 (19,664-22,665 in 2019]. Outpatient MISVHR was more expensive than OVHR [$11,558 (11,174-11,942 MIS vs. $6807 (6620-6994) OVHR in 2019]. The estimated cost of an inpatient MISVHR remained similar between 2016 and 2019, from $20,076 (13,374-20,777) to $21,165 (19,664-22,665) and increased slightly from $9975 (9639-10,312) to $11,558 (11,174-11,942) in the outpatient setting. The estimated cost of an inpatient OVHR increased from $31,383 (30,338-32,428) to $35,511 (34,100-36,921), while outpatient costs increased from $6018 (5860-6175) to $6807 (6620-6994). VHR costs decreased slightly over the study period to a mean cost of $9.7 billion dollars in 2019. CONCLUSION: Compared to 2006 national data, VHRs in the United States have almost doubled to 611,000 per year with an estimated annual cost of $9.7 billion. A 1% decrease in VHR achieved through recurrence reduction or hernia prophylaxis could save the US healthcare system at least $139.9 million annually.

Core strength training influences basketball players' body / A influência do treinamento de força do core no corpo de jogadores de basquete / La influencia del entrenamiento de la fuerza central en el cuerpo de los jugadores de baloncesto

ABSTRACT Introduction Modern basketball is very competitive and enjoyable; it combines several factors. Basketball requires specific physical characteristics such as high stature, which raises the position of the center of gravity, making the stability angle smaller. This compromises stability, especially in sudden speed and direction changes, because it requires a large base opening. The core musculature is intimately involved with body balance; however, there is a lack of studies verifying the impact of specific training of this region on balance in basketball athletes. Objective To explore the influence of core strengthening on the physical fitness of college basketball players. Methods 12 college basketball players were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group. The experimental group performed core strengthening training, while the control group practiced traditional strength training. After six weeks, physical fitness and basic skills were compared between the groups. Data were statistically treated and discussed confronting the literature. Results Basketball players in the experimental group obtained higher fast dribbling passes and shots than before the experiment (P<0.05), there was no statistically significant difference in several indicators in the control group ( P>0.05); Basketball players in the experimental group had higher fast dribbling passes and shots than the control group (P<0.05), there was no statistically significant difference in approach height between the experimental group and the control group (P>0.05). Conclusion Core strengthening training can improve the physical fitness of college basketball players. Evidence level II; Therapeutic Studies - Investigating the results.

RESUMO Introdução O basquete moderno é muito competitivo e prazeroso, é uma combinação de vários fatores. O basquetebol exige características físicas específicas como a alta estatura, que eleva a posição do centro de gravidade, tornando o ângulo de estabilidade menor. Isso compromete a estabilidade, principalmente nas mudanças repentinas de velocidade e direção pois exige grande abertura de base. A musculatura do core está intimamente envolvida com o equilíbrio corporal, entretanto faltam estudos verificando o impacto do treino específico dessa região no equilíbrio em atletas de basquetebol. Objetivo Explorar a influência do fortalecimento do core na aptidão física dos jogadores universitários de basquete. Métodos 12 universitários jogadores de basquete foram selecionados e aleatoriamente divididos em grupo controle e grupo experimental. O experimental realizou treino fortalecimento do core, enquanto o controle praticava treinamento de força tradicional. Após seis semanas, comparou-se a aptidão física e habilidades básicas entre os grupos. Os dados foram tratados estatisticamente e discutidos confrontando a literatura. Resultados Os jogadores de basquete do grupo experimental obtiveram maiores passes rápidos de drible e arremessos do que antes do experimento (P<0,05), não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa em vários indicadores no grupo controle ( P>0,05); Os jogadores de basquete do grupo experimental apresentaram maiores passes e arremessos de drible rápido do que o grupo controle (P<0,05), não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa na altura de aproximação entre o grupo experimental e o grupo controle (P>0,05). Conclusão O treino de fortalecimento do core pode melhorar a aptidão física de jogadores universitários de basquete. Nível de evidência II; Estudos terapêuticos - Investigação de resultados.

RESUMEN Introducción El baloncesto moderno es muy competitivo y divertido, es una combinación de varios factores. El baloncesto exige características físicas específicas como la alta estatura, que eleva la posición del centro de gravedad, haciendo que el ángulo de estabilidad sea menor. Esto compromete la estabilidad, sobre todo en los cambios bruscos de velocidad y dirección, porque exige una gran apertura de la base. Los músculos del core están íntimamente implicados con el equilibrio corporal, sin embargo, faltan estudios que verifiquen el impacto del entrenamiento específico de esta región sobre el equilibrio en los deportistas de baloncesto. Objetivo Explorar la influencia del fortalecimiento del núcleo en la aptitud física de los jugadores universitarios de baloncesto. Métodos Se seleccionaron 12 jugadores de baloncesto universitario y se dividieron aleatoriamente en un grupo de control y un grupo experimental. Los experimentales realizaron un entrenamiento de fortalecimiento del núcleo, mientras que los de control practicaron un entrenamiento de fuerza tradicional. Después de 6 semanas, se comparó la aptitud física y las habilidades básicas entre los grupos. Los datos fueron tratados estadísticamente y discutidos confrontándolos con la literatura. Resultados Los jugadores de baloncesto del grupo experimental obtuvieron pases y tiros rápidos más altos que antes del experimento (P<0,05), no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en varios indicadores en el grupo de control ( P>0,05); Los jugadores de baloncesto del grupo experimental tuvieron pases y tiros rápidos más altos que el grupo de control (P<0,05), no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la altura de aproximación entre el grupo experimental y el grupo de control (P>0,05). Conclusión El entrenamiento de fortalecimiento del núcleo puede mejorar la condición física de los jugadores de baloncesto universitarios. Nivel de evidencia II; Estudios terapéuticos - Investigación de resultados.

Evaluation of Treatment Differences Between Men and Women Undergoing Ventral Hernia Repair: An Analysis of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Sex is emerging as an important clinical variable associated with surgical outcomes and decision making. However, its relevance in regard to baseline and treatment differences in primary and incisional ventral hernia repair remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database to identify elective umbilical, epigastric, or incisional hernia repairs. Propensity matching was performed to investigate confounder-adjusted treatment differences between men and women. Treatments of interest included surgical approach (minimally invasive or open), mesh use, mesh type, mesh position, anesthesia type, myofascial release, fascial closure, and fixation use. RESULTS: A total of 8,489 umbilical, 1,801 epigastric, and 16,626 incisional hernia repairs were identified. Women undergoing primary ventral hernia repair were younger (umbilical 46.4 vs 54 years, epigastric 48.7 vs 52.7 years), with lower BMI (umbilical 30.4 vs 31.5, epigastric 29.2 vs 31.1), and less likely diabetic (umbilical 9.9% vs 11.4%, epigastric 6.8% vs 8.8%). Women undergoing incisional hernia repair were also younger (mean 57.5 vs 59.1 years), but with higher BMI (33.1 vs 31.5), and more likely diabetic (21.4% vs 19.1%). Propensity-matched analysis included 3,644 umbilical, 1,232 epigastric, and 12,480 incisional hernias. Women with incisional hernia were less likely to undergo an open repair (60.2% vs 63.4%, p < 0.001) and have mesh used (93.8% vs 94.8%, p = 0.02). In umbilical and incisional hernia repairs, women had higher rates of intraperitoneal mesh placement and men had higher rates of preperitoneal and retro-muscular mesh placement. CONCLUSIONS: Small but statistically significant treatment differences in operative approach, mesh use, and mesh position exist between men and women undergoing ventral hernia repair. It remains unknown whether these treatment differences result in differing clinical outcomes.

Are Surgeons of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative Following Guidelines in Umbilical and Epigastric Hernia Repair?

BACKGROUND: Umbilical and epigastric hernias are among the top three most common hernia surgeries performed in the USA with varied techniques. The European and Americas Hernia Societies (EAHS) recently published guidelines for repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias. We evaluated how closely the general surgeons of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) follow these guidelines and to identify areas for possible improvement. METHOD: Data from patients undergoing elective and emergent umbilical or epigastric hernia repair from 2013 to 2021 were extracted from the ACHQC database. The procedures performed on eligible subjects were compared to those proposed by the EAHS guidelines. Data was reported as a percentage and a cutoff of 70% was selected to determine compliance. RESULTS: Based on these criteria, 11,088 patients were included and most of the recommendations, including appropriate preoperative antibiotic dosing (96.1% umbilical; 97.2% epigastric), permanent mesh selection (umbilical 97.8%; 96.1 epigastric), mesh fixation with suture (83.6% umbilical; 75.5% epigastric), use of mesh for open repair of hernias greater than 1 cm (83.6 umbilical; 85.7 epigastric), and primary defect closure during open (98.6% umbilical; 97.5% epigastric) and laparoscopic (99.6% umbilical; 100% epigastric) repair, were met. DISCUSSION: Surgeons of the ACHQC adhere to most of the published guidelines on umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. Further research is needed to reinforce or modify the existing recommendations. Standardization of surgical approach will facilitate additional research needed to improve procedural efficiency, while reducing negative outcomes and cost.

Are perioperative outcomes in cancer-related ventral incisional hernia repair worse than in the general population? An Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) database study.

PURPOSE: Patients with a history of cancer-related abdominal surgery undergoing incisional hernia repair (IHR) are highly heterogenous and increasingly prevalent. We explored whether cancer surgery should be considered an independent risk factor for worse IHR perioperative outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing IHR between 2018 and 2020 were identified within the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC). Regression models were used to assess associations between cancer operation history and 30 d surgical site occurrences-exclusive of infection (SSO-EIs), surgical site infections (SSIs), reoperations, time to recurrence, and quality of life (QoL) scores. Cancer cohort subgroup analysis was performed for operative approach and mesh location. RESULTS: 8019 patients who underwent IHR were identified in the ACHQC, 1321 of which had a history of cancer operation. Cancer cohort patients were more likely to be older, males with a higher ASA status and lower BMI, and have longer and wider hernias (p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding, the cancer cohort was less likely to experience SSO-EIs (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.94 p = 0.0092) and showed lower odds of SSIs, reoperations, and recurrence (SSI OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.47-1.05, p = 0.0542; reoperation OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.37-1.17, p = 0.1002; recurrence OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.63-1.02, p = 0.08). There was no difference in postoperative QoL scores between cohorts. There were also no differences in perioperative or QoL outcomes within the cancer cohort based on operative approach or mesh location. CONCLUSION: These data show no evidence that history of cancer operation predisposes patients to worse incisional hernia repair perioperative or quality of life outcomes.

Building a Center for Abdominal Core Health: The Importance of a Holistic Multidisciplinary Approach.

BACKGROUND: This article seeks to be a collection of evidence and experience-based information for health care providers around the country and world looking to build or improve an abdominal core health center. Abdominal core health has proven to be a chronic condition despite advancements in surgical technique, technology, and equipment. The need for a holistic approach has been discussed and thought to be necessary to improve the care of this complex patient population. METHODS: Literature relevant to the key aspects of building an abdominal core health center was thoroughly reviewed by multiple members of our abdominal core health center. This information was combined with our authors' experiences to gather relevant information for those looking to build or improve a holistic abdominal core health center. RESULTS: An abundance of publications have been combined with multiple members of our abdominal core health centers members experience's culminating in a wide breadth of information relevant to those looking to build or improve a holistic abdominal core health center. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence- and experience-based information has been collected to assist those looking to build or grow an abdominal core health center.

Comparing rates of bowel injury for laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia repair: a retrospective analysis of the abdominal core health quality collaborative.

PURPOSE: Bowel injury during laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia repair is a rare but potentially serious complication. We sought to compare bowel injury rates during minimally invasive approaches to ventral hernia repair using a national hernia registry. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia repair (including cases converted-to-open) between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively identified in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative registry. The primary outcome was bowel injury, which included partial- and full-thickness injuries and re-operations for missed enterotomies. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 10,660 patients were included (4116 laparoscopic, 6544 robotic). The laparoscopic group included more incisional hernias (68% vs 62%, p < 0.001) and similar rates of recurrent hernias (23% vs 22%, p = 0.26). A total of 109 bowel injuries were identified, with more occurring in the laparoscopic group (55 [1.3%] laparoscopic vs. 54 [0.8%] robotic; p = 0.01). Specifically, there were more full-thickness and missed enterotomies in the laparoscopic group (29 laparoscopic vs. 20 robotic; p = 0.012). Bowel injury resulted in higher rates of wound morbidity and major post-operative complications including sepsis, re-admission, and re-operation. Following adjustment for recurrent and incisional hernias, prior mesh, patient age, and hernia width, bowel injury during laparoscopic repair remained significantly more likely than bowel injury during robotic repair (OR 1.669 [95% C.I.: 1.141-2.440]; p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In a large registry, laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is associated with an increased risk of bowel injury compared to repairs utilizing the robotic platform. Knowing the limitations of retrospective research, large national registries are well suited to explore rare outcomes which cannot be feasibly assessed with randomized controlled trials.

Diferencias de actividad electromiográfica abdominal en el entrenamiento del core / Differences of abdominal electromiographic activity in core training

Resumen Introducción: La musculatura del core involucra a todos los grupos musculares ubicados en la zona media del cuerpo. La metodología clínica de elección para el registro y análisis de su actividad bioeléctrica es la electromiografía superficial (sEMG), metodología clínica para el registro y posterior análisis de las actividades bioeléctricas del músculo esquelético. Objetivo: El objetivo de esta investigación es determinar si existen diferencias de actividad electromiográfica en la musculatura del recto abdominal y oblicuo externo entre practicantes de musculación y practicantes de calistenia. Metodología: El estudio es de tipo comparativo, de diseño no experimental, transversal de enfoque cuantitativo en una muestra de 20 sujetos; 10 practicantes de calistenia y 10 que entrenan con ejercicios de musculación clásicos. Resultados: Los ejercicios que tuvieron mayor respuesta electromiográfica fueron abdominal en suspensión y abdominal inclinado. Conclusiones: La calistenia es una alternativa viable para la activación muscular a nivel del Core.

Abstract Introduction: The Core musculature involves all the muscle groups located in the middle area of the body whose activity can be measured using superficial electromyography (sEMG), a clinical methodology for recording and subsequent analysis of skeletal muscle bioelectric activities. Objectives: The objective of this research is to determine if there are differences in electromyographic activity in the muscles of the rectus abdominis and external oblique between bodybuilding practitioners and calisthenics practitioners. Methodology: A comparative study, non-experimental design, cross-sectional with a quantitative approach in a sample of 20 subjects; 10 calisthenics practitioners and 10 who train with classic bodybuilding exercises. Results: The exercises with the greatest electromyographic response were abdominal in suspension and abdominal incline. Conclusions: Calisthenics is a viable alternative for muscle activation at the Core level.

Effect of birth ball abdominal core training on pregnancy fatigue, waist pain and delivery outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of birth ball abdominal core training on fatigue, waist pain, and delivery outcomes in middle and late pregnancy. METHODS: A prospective study of 209 primipara in total with 24-27 weeks of gestation were recruited and divided into the training group (109 cases) and the control group (100 cases). The control group received routine prenatal exercise. On the basis of routine prenatal exercise, pregnant women in the training group were given birth ball exercises based on abdominal core training. The difference in pregnancy fatigue, waist discomfort, and delivery outcomes between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The waist pain and fatigue ratings of women were significantly lower and the vaginal delivery rate (74.3%) was significantly higher (62%) (P < 0.001) in the training group. There were no significant differences in the total stage of labor, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal weight and 1-min neonatal Apgar score between the two groups. The rate of episiotomy in the training group (14.7%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (25.0%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Birth ball exercises can relieve fatigue and waist pain in middle and late 2021 pregnancy, reduce the rate of episiotomy, and promote spontaneous vaginal delivery.

A National Evaluation of Surgeon Experiences in Telemedicine for the Care of Hernia and Abdominal Core Health Patients.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons are increasingly utilizing telemedicine to provide perioperative services to patients. Safety, satisfaction, and feasibility of these programs in general populations have been established, but it is unclear how telemedicine can be integrated into subspecialty care. We report results of a national survey related to telehealth practices among members of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC). METHODS: Survey responses were analyzed to determine current strategies in telemedicine utilization. Surgeon preferences, perceptions of validity, and identified barriers to implementation of telemedicine were assessed. RESULTS: Forty surgeons within the ACHQC responded, with 90% of respondents reporting use of telemedicine to deliver perioperative care to patients with hernias and abdominal core health concerns. Surgeons appeared to be more comfortable managing preoperative patients with image-confirmed diagnoses of hernias. Surgeons were universally more comfortable delivering postoperative care via telemedicine. Connectivity, patient engagement, and reimbursement were identified as potential barriers to expansion of telemedicine. Seventy-eight percent of respondents reported that they would increase telemedicine utilization if current regulations were maintained in the future. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that hernia specialists are utilizing telemedicine at a higher rate than before the COVID-19 pandemic, with surgeons reporting interest in continued use of this modality beyond the pandemic. These findings suggest that future work in telemedicine optimization may improve the quality of care that can be delivered to patients with abdominal core health concerns.

Surgical repair of diastasis recti abdominis provides long-term improvement of abdominal core function and quality of life: a 3-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) is a condition affecting many post-partum women. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term results of surgical repair of DRA in a cohort of post-partum women. METHODS: Sixty post-partum women with DRA and training-resistant core dysfunctions were included. Surgical repair was performed with suture plication of the linea alba. Abdominal core function was evaluated with the abdominal trunk function protocol (ATFP) including a self-report questionnaire and seven functional tests. Urinary incontinence and quality of life were evaluated with the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) and the SF-36 questionnaire. Follow-up was performed at 1 and 3 years after surgery. RESULTS: Response rate at the 3-year follow-up was 86.7 per cent for the disability rating index (DRI) questionnaire; and 71.7 per cent for the ATFP, UDI-6, IIQ-7 and SF-36 questionnaires. All DRI parameters were improved (P < 0.001) after 3 years of follow-up compared with preoperative values. The functional tests in the ATFP showed an improvement in core muscle strength and stability (P < 0.001), back muscle strength (P < 0.001) and abdominal muscle strength (P = 0.002) compared to preoperative values as well as an improvement of core muscle strength and stability compared with the 1-year follow-up values (P = 0.003). UDI-6 and IIQ-7 results were improved (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004) compared with preoperative values and showed consistent values compared with the 1-year follow-up (P = 0.09 and P = 1.0). Quality of life measured with SF-36 was improved compared with preoperative values and showed consistent values compared with the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: The functional improvement of surgical reconstruction of the DRA persisted for 3 years in this series of post-partum women with DRA.

Management of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles: recommendations for swedish national guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle is a common condition. There are no generally accepted criteria for diagnosis or treatment of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle, which causes uncertainty for the patient and healthcare providers alike. METHODS: The consensus document was created by a group of Swedish surgeons and based on a structured literature review and practical experience. RESULTS: The proposed criteria for diagnosis and treatment of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle are as follows: (1) Diastasis diagnosed at clinical examination using a caliper or ruler for measurement. Diagnostic imaging by ultrasound or other imaging modality, should be performed when concurrent umbilical or epigastric hernia or other cause of the patient's symptoms cannot be excluded. (2) Physiotherapy is the firsthand treatment for diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle. Surgery should only be considered in diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle patients with functional impairment, and not until the patient has undergone a standardized 6-month abdominal core training program. (3) The largest width of the diastasis should be at least 5 cm before surgical treatment is considered. In case of pronounced abdominal bulging or concomitant ventral hernia, surgery may be considered in patients with a smaller diastasis. (4) When surgery is undertaken, at least 2 years should have elapsed since last childbirth and future pregnancy should not be planned. (5) Plication of the linea alba is the firsthand surgical technique. Other techniques may be used but have not been found superior. DISCUSSION: The level of evidence behind these statements varies, but they are intended to lay down a standard strategy for treatment of diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle and to enable uniformity of management.